Further thought on the Hypocrisy of the ACLU

When was the last time, or would that be the first time, that the ACLU went to court to protect someone 2nd Amendment right?

Well the answer is never because of all of the rights in the Bill of Rights the 2nd is the only one that the ACLU has taken a stand on that it is not an individual right. Meaning that it is a states right. How ridiculous is that? What kind of mental gymnastics must one go through to come up with that opinion?

And what can we derive from this? First that the ACLU selects which rights it wants to protect and only parts of amendments that they wants to champion.

As an organization it is hypocritical and its leadership is selective in what Amendments it will defend because they are agenda driven and that agenda is the same agenda that inspired its communist founders to form the ACLU. To use the very Constitution of this country to destroy this country. To warp the meanings and intentions of the founding fathers, to deliberately misconstrue the writings, character, and history of the revolution. To support outright, lies when needed, to advance their goals.

The very idea that the constitution contains a separation of church and state, that the right to bear arms is a state’s right or that it ever occurred to the men that signed the Constitution and ratified the Bill of Rights that a woman would have the right to murder their unborn child and that it would be protected under the right of privacy is a travesty.

Does anyone really believe that this was the intent of the framers of the Constitution?

If you say yes then you are a liar or a fool. If you say that it is the natural evolution of a living document then you are truly delusional.